Maybe it will shed some light about this lens.
http://www.photozone.de/canon-eos/526-samyang8f35eos?start=1 A Kielcz Cincinnati, Ohio, U.S.A. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
--- In [hidden email], A Kielcz <roblee007@...> wrote: > > Maybe it will shed some light about this lens. > http://www.photozone.de/canon-eos/526-samyang8f35eos?start=1 It's all very interesting, but can you show us an actual panorama that you made with this lens? |
Uri,
You can see a pano made with this lens (Canon 5D mkII + Samyang 8mm@f8) here: http://bit.ly/idS8Fb Regards, Ricardo Em 26/01/2011 16:19, Uri escreveu: > > > > --- In [hidden email] > <mailto:PanoToolsNG%40yahoogroups.com>, A Kielcz > <roblee007@...> wrote: > > > > Maybe it will shed some light about this lens. > > http://www.photozone.de/canon-eos/526-samyang8f35eos?start=1 > > It's all very interesting, but can you show us an actual > panorama that you made with this lens? > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
Yeah, but I guess it wasn't exactly that what Uri was asking for... ;)
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 3:52 PM, Ricardo TVB < [hidden email]> wrote: > > > Uri, > > You can see a pano made with this lens (Canon 5D mkII + > Samyang 8mm@f8) here: http://bit.ly/idS8Fb > > Regards, > > Ricardo > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
In reply to this post by Ricardo TVB
date on your computer is set wrong
A Kielcz Cincinnati, Ohio, U.S.A. --- On Thu, 7/1/10, Ricardo TVB <[hidden email]> wrote: From: Ricardo TVB <[hidden email]> Subject: Re: [PanoToolsNG] Re: Samyang 8mm review To: [hidden email] Date: Thursday, July 1, 2010, 3:52 PM Uri, You can see a pano made with this lens (Canon 5D mkII + Samyang 8mm@f8) here: http://bit.ly/idS8Fb Regards, Ricardo Em 26/01/2011 16:19, Uri escreveu: > > > > --- In [hidden email] > <mailto:PanoToolsNG%40yahoogroups.com>, A Kielcz > <roblee007@...> wrote: > > > > Maybe it will shed some light about this lens. > > http://www.photozone.de/canon-eos/526-samyang8f35eos?start=1 > > It's all very interesting, but can you show us an actual > panorama that you made with this lens? > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
In reply to this post by uricogan
Here is a pano, but made with 18-200.
I screwed up. http://www.flickr.com/photos/aak071946/?saved=1 A Kielcz Cincinnati, Ohio, U.S.A. --- On Wed, 1/26/11, Uri <[hidden email]> wrote: From: Uri <[hidden email]> Subject: [PanoToolsNG] Re: Samyang 8mm review To: [hidden email] Date: Wednesday, January 26, 2011, 1:19 PM --- In [hidden email], A Kielcz <roblee007@...> wrote: > > Maybe it will shed some light about this lens. > http://www.photozone.de/canon-eos/526-samyang8f35eos?start=1 It's all very interesting, but can you show us an actual panorama that you made with this lens? [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
--- In [hidden email], A Kielcz <roblee007@...> wrote: > > Here is a pano, but made with 18-200. > I screwed up. > http://www.flickr.com/photos/aak071946/?saved=1 Huh? I saw some nice fish-eye shots, no panorama... |
In reply to this post by uricogan
these few hundred panos http://www.360cities.net/map#lat=20.88337&lng=-103.83668&name=tequila-streets-1472&zoom=16 samyang 8mm (vivitar 7mm actually, they're the same lens) canon 5d mk1 3shots around only! :-) i shot these in one week in tequila. jet lag = awake at sunrise :) --- In [hidden email], "Uri" <uri@...> wrote: > > > > --- In [hidden email], A Kielcz <roblee007@> wrote: > > > > Maybe it will shed some light about this lens. > > http://www.photozone.de/canon-eos/526-samyang8f35eos?start=1 > > > It's all very interesting, but can you show us an actual panorama that you made with this lens? > |
In reply to this post by uricogan
the first one is panorama of Biltmore Estate in NC
A Kielcz Cincinnati, Ohio, U.S.A. --- On Wed, 1/26/11, Uri <[hidden email]> wrote: From: Uri <[hidden email]> Subject: [PanoToolsNG] Re: Samyang 8mm review To: [hidden email] Date: Wednesday, January 26, 2011, 8:36 PM --- In [hidden email], A Kielcz <roblee007@...> wrote: > > Here is a pano, but made with 18-200. > I screwed up. > http://www.flickr.com/photos/aak071946/?saved=1 Huh? I saw some nice fish-eye shots, no panorama... [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
In reply to this post by A Kielcz
You said "3 around". Did you shave it? I use a Samyang 8mm with Nikon D70
"unshaved" and take 4 +1up + 1down. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
In reply to this post by A Kielcz
--- In [hidden email], A Kielcz <roblee007@...> wrote: > > the first one is panorama of Biltmore Estate in NC > > > http://www.flickr.com/photos/aak071946/?saved=1 All I found is a wide angle jpg image, not interactive. Is it stitched? how many shots, and what lens? |
In reply to this post by Greg Voisan
yes it's shaved. it would be quite silly to use a non-shaved samyang on a canon 5d :)
I had it shaved by Tobias Vollmer, and I can highly recommend his services. Very professional and quick turn-around. Jeffrey --- In [hidden email], Greg Voisan <gregvoisan@...> wrote: > > You said "3 around". Did you shave it? I use a Samyang 8mm with Nikon D70 > "unshaved" and take 4 +1up + 1down. > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > |
In reply to this post by uricogan
The one on top is stitched 5 images. Not sayang, 18-200 Nikkor.
Below are only single images from Samyang 8mm A Kielcz Cincinnati, Ohio, U.S.A. --- On Fri, 1/28/11, Uri <[hidden email]> wrote: From: Uri <[hidden email]> Subject: [PanoToolsNG] Re: Samyang 8mm review To: [hidden email] Date: Friday, January 28, 2011, 1:53 AM --- In [hidden email], A Kielcz <roblee007@...> wrote: > > the first one is panorama of Biltmore Estate in NC > > > http://www.flickr.com/photos/aak071946/?saved=1 All I found is a wide angle jpg image, not interactive. Is it stitched? how many shots, and what lens? [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
Came on Kielcz you know what we want ;) you know we'll help if you need, go out and make a full spherical panorama for us to see ;)
Well, maybe no right this instant, is it still snowing there? Paulo Fernandes Sent from my iPhone On 28 de Jan de 2011, at 14:38, A Kielcz <[hidden email]> wrote: > The one on top is stitched 5 images. Not sayang, 18-200 Nikkor. > Below are only single images from Samyang 8mm > > A Kielcz > > Cincinnati, Ohio, U.S.A. > > --- On Fri, 1/28/11, Uri <[hidden email]> wrote: > > From: Uri <[hidden email]> > Subject: [PanoToolsNG] Re: Samyang 8mm review > To: [hidden email] > Date: Friday, January 28, 2011, 1:53 AM > > > > --- In [hidden email], A Kielcz <roblee007@...> wrote: > > > > > > the first one is panorama of Biltmore Estate in NC > > > > > > > http://www.flickr.com/photos/aak071946/?saved=1 > > All I found is a wide angle jpg image, not interactive. Is it stitched? how many shots, and what lens? > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
In reply to this post by A Kielcz
These panos were all made with the Samyang 8mm and a Nikon D70. I've only
been doing this for the past 8 months, so be kind. http://www.360cities.net/search/@author-360photoprojects [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
In reply to this post by A Kielcz
Sorry, forgot the link:
http://www.360cities.net/search/@author-360photoprojects [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
I looked at your Lyon Air Museum Pano. It seems you should be able to get a sharper image with the Samyang 8mm. What f stop was that at? About f9 is best. Were you using a high ISO? Tripod mounted I try to be in the 100-400 range. Hand held I guess you might need to use higher. I saw some stitching errors in the structure of the ceiling, but not too bad. Here's one I did of the evergreen Aviation Museum with the same lens, Canon 50D: http://www.360cities.net/image/evergreen-aviation-space-museum-sr-71-usa#-184.32,0.43,80.2 I have some stitch errors in the ceiling as well (behind the flag, ah I shouldn't have told you where). It seems no matter how long I look at the busy ones I miss some spots. Regards, David B --- In [hidden email], Greg Voisan <gregvoisan@...> wrote: > > Sorry, forgot the link: > > http://www.360cities.net/search/@author-360photoprojects > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > |
Hi David!
> > Here's one I did of the evergreen Aviation Museum with the same lens, Canon > 50D: > Nice panos. Handheld? -- L.D.I. Felipe B. González C. [hidden email] 1998-5246 www.fpk.com.mx http://recorridosvirtualesmexico.blogspot.com/ Socio Director Maquetas Virtuales www.maquetasvirtuales.com Socio Director Recorridos Virtuales www.recorridosvirtuales.com [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
In reply to this post by David-6
Ooh nice. Thanks for sharing.
The sr71 actually woke up me once from a deep sleep coming into Oshkosh. Didn't think they were supposed to break the barrier over land. s From: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of David Sent: Friday, January 28, 2011 9:06 PM To: [hidden email] Subject: [PanoToolsNG] Re: Samyang 8mm review I looked at your Lyon Air Museum Pano. It seems you should be able to get a sharper image with the Samyang 8mm. What f stop was that at? About f9 is best. Were you using a high ISO? Tripod mounted I try to be in the 100-400 range. Hand held I guess you might need to use higher. I saw some stitching errors in the structure of the ceiling, but not too bad. Here's one I did of the evergreen Aviation Museum with the same lens, Canon 50D: http://www.360cities.net/image/evergreen-aviation-space-museum-sr-71-usa#-18 4.32,0.43,80.2 I have some stitch errors in the ceiling as well (behind the flag, ah I shouldn't have told you where). It seems no matter how long I look at the busy ones I miss some spots. Regards, David B [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
In reply to this post by A Kielcz
David:
I shot these all at f8 ISO 200 on a D70. It's hard for me to get the focus right. - Greg [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |